(Please see Bernie Ward I post of May 15, 2008.)

Some media types have tried to label Bernie’s “accomplice” in disseminating kiddie porn as a dominatrix, but it turns out she’s just a normal woman, which no doubt will not endear her to those media types.  See and listen to her: http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/iteam&id=6145828 .

 You have to wonder however why those media types tried to discredit her. 

The senior senator from Delaware, Joe Biden, never fails to demonstrate that he suffers from a significant deficiency of true class.  His most recent outburst, calling GWB’s denial that he was referring to Obama as an appeaser “Bullshit” was just one more example of that deficiency.  http://www.politico.com/blogs/thecrypt/0508/Biden_Bushs_comments_were_bullshit.html

Having run and having failed in this his latest of four tries for the Democratic nomination for president, he seems to have his eye on Harold Stassen’s record of futile presidential bids.  One might therefore think that he could have better chosen his description of a sitting president’s words as Bullshit, but with Joe it’s understandable.  

Here’s a guy who in 1988 had to admit to plagiarism while at Syracuse Law School in 1965, as well as to inflating his academic record, and other chicanery, such as ”borrowing” lines from a British pol (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/frenzy/biden.htm).  Yet, like his good buddy, the unindicted murderer and fellow pagiarizer, Teddy Kennedy, he gets away with it and the poor dumb Delewareans keep reelecting him. 

Personally, I think Biden hit his low point when, sucking up to the “gay” vote in the first Democratic debate, he suggested his young daughters may end up as lesbians, a prediction that must have fascinated his girls.

Look, Biden’s hair transplants/plugs a while back–which looked like mini cornrows– may be seen as just a demonstration of the guy’s vain, midlife crisis, (or a pitch for the Black vote?). But with his checkered past shouldn’t he be a tad more judicious nowadays as he enters his dotage?

His possible-future-lesbian daughters should remind him, “Daddy!  2012 is just four years away!”

http://townhall.com/TalkRadio/Show.aspx?ContentGuid=71718f86-671a-4991-9270-faf718bbaf4c&RadioShowId=2

Thursday May 15, 2008

The Role of Race in the 2008 Race

Mike Gallagher

Mike examines how race is affecting the way different groups are voting this year.

Length: 00:14:36

Pacifism in the extreme holds that no matter what violence is committed against a person that person should shrug it off, tolerate it, and God forbid, not retaliate.  Whether that violence involves physical assault, theft of property, murder or even war, pacifism dictates tolerance.  (See: http://www.importanceofphilosophy.com/Evil_Pacifism.html) 

Appeasement may be considered an adjunct and a requisite of pacifism.  Both examples of foolishness led to World War II as well as to September 11th, 2001.  (See:  http://www.city-journal.org/html/14_2_the_fruits.html)

The attraction of pacifism and appeasement is the warm and fuzzy feeling they confer, that sense of superiority and moral rectitude in the face of evil, violent warmongerers.  That same attraction resulted in 60,000,000 dead in World War II and 3,000 dead in 2001–small consolation for warm fuzzies. 

Today, as Yogi would say, it’s deja vu’ all over again as Barack Hussein Obama demonstrated here:  http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewPolitics.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200805/POL20080515f.html. 

When will they ever learn?

To a degree, being known by the company we keep can be an unfair assessment of who we are.  For example, maybe a person is simply “broad-minded,” and enjoys associating with an eclectic group of people.  That’s fine by me.

But when that eclectic melange isn’t a melange at all, when that grouping of friends and associates lacks any true variations and rather consists of very similar types in terms of philosophy, world view, and convictions, that company the person is keeping is more akin to a coterie of like-thinkers, a veritable gang.  In that case, we can indeed know that person by the company he keeps.

Senator Barack Hussein Obama has a fascinating coterie.  And let’s put to rest objections to the use of his middle name since it is his given middle name and if it’s permissible for fellow Blacks such as Reverend James Manning to use it so too may I (See  previous 2 posts, OBAMA XXVII and OBAMA XXVIII). 

Apart from the usual political sycophants and hangers-on attracted like flies to dung and aside from his former pastor Rev. Jeremiah Wright and confessed terrorist Bill Ayers, Obama has some other curious bedfellows.  They include radicals such as Demond Mullins who served a stint in Iraq and admits to “dehumanizing” innocent women and children while on tour there.  (Anyone recall John Kerry in ‘Nam?)  Poor Demond.  He not only participated in that dehumanization and abuse but was aware of female soldiers being raped by fellow soldiers–and did nothing about it! 

Mullins was a paid consultant for unspecified services to the Obama campaign.  (http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCommentary.asp?Page=/Commentary/archive/200805/COM20080514b.html)

For other stellar Obama advisors, see http://blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix/2007/01/the_obama_inner_circle.html and BarackObama.com (NO MIDDLE NAME!)   Don’t expect to see Bill Ayers, Rev. Wright, or Tony Rezko there.

Then again, Bilary is being advised by such Dem icons as Madeline Albright and Sandy (How Was I To Know I Was Stuffing Top Secret Documents In My Socks) Berger.

I think the company kept by both Democratic candidates says a great deal about them and about what the future holds should they be elected.

Ok, this more recent video of Rev. Manning is definitely not PG!  Even I don’t buy that Oprah, and Wright and Obama are “the trinity of evil” and all are “gay.” 

Maybe I’m naive? 

http://youtube.com/watch?v=ejTmistHFw0

It’s axiomatic in most families that we are free to criticize our fellow family members but let no one else dare to criticize any of our family.  The same usually goes for our religion and our race. 

Thus, whether they be Christian or Jew, it is generally permissible for fellow Christians and Jews to critique other Christians and other Jews; it’s considered to be all in the family and constructive criticism. 

Likewise with race.  For rappers and other Blacks to use the word nigger is considered by African-Americans reprehensible but such usage has been acceptable, at least until very recently.  However, let a White American dare to use the N-word and woe be unto him!

This brings us to the Reverend James David Manning, Black Harlem pastor of the Atlah World Missionary Church for some twenty-seven years.  In this first of two videos, filmed on March 15th, 2008, Rev. Manning excoriates Barack Hussein Obama, and makes no bones about using Osama’s middle name.  The second video was filmed May 15th, and makes the first seem almost tame.  (See next post for the second video.)

CAUTION!  Unlike Rev. Jeremiah Wright’s “sermons,” this can be rated PG or maybe PG 13, but it is nevertheless incendiary:   http://msunderestimated.com/2008/03/15/rev-manning-on-obama-video/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpGH02DtIws

Osama/Obama’s slip of his Islamic lip about “campaigning hard” in 57 states–not including Alaska or Hawaii–finally outed him for what he is. Those “57 states” must have included such states as Morocco, Egypt, Sudan, Iran, Niger, Somalia, and Saudi Arabia. The United States of America, the USA, has had a mere 50 states since 1959. Osama/Obama must have been thinking of The Organization of the Islamic Conference, the OIC, which has 57 states.

That Freudian/ Islamic slip exposed that brilliant guy who would be President of the United States, which is not to say that he will ever be called on it by the media.

McCain, if he has any gonads, should at least mention it before November!

Please see:  http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0508/10314.html

No further comment but a reminder is apt: 

What’s in a name?  Quite a bit, actually. 

Take MICHELLE as in Michelle Robinson Obama and MICHELLE as in Michelle Malkin.  The latter Michelle is a witty, pretty, and intelligent author, conservative blogger (See HOTAIR.COM), and commentator.  The former Michelle is a whining, narcissistic, angry, bitter, scowling harridan, according to Ms. Malkin. (http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCommentary.asp?Page=/Commentary/archive/200805/COM20080507a.html) 

Personally, I’d just cut to the chase and call Michelle Obama a bitch, but Michelle Malkin is too much a lady to use such epithets. 

And as for comparisons of Ms. Obama with the refined and ladylike Jackie Kennedy, they are about as valid as comparing Barack with Jack Kennedy. 

Listen up Obamas:  I didn’t know Jackie or Jack but trust me, you two are no Jackie or Jack!