Islam, theÂ self-proclaimed “religion of peace,” is no more about peace than it is aboutÂ civilized conduct, mature behavior, or even common decency.
Aside from Islam’s centuries-old history of warfare and mayhem, when an ayatollah orders someone toÂ murder a pope, when Muslim cleric preaches that girl babiesÂ mustÂ be totally covered byÂ a burka so that they won’t be sexually molested by other Muslims, when an Islamic group plans a massive march on Washington on the anniversary of 9/11 ostensibly to demand their civil rights,Â normal people must question the sanity of the “religion of peace” as well as the mental health of its more than 1.6 billion adherents.
An “ayatollah,” a termÂ designating aÂ ”Sign of Allah,” is supposedlyÂ an expert in Islamic jurisprudence, ethics, and philosophy.
Â MUSLIM MURDER.Â According to Turkish national Mehmet Ali AÄŸca, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the deranged “religious” leader whoÂ launched the Iranian revolution and orchestrated the November 4, 1979 attack onÂ the U.S. Embassy in Tehran and the illegal imprisonment ofÂ 60 American hostages for 444 days, orderedÂ AÄŸca toÂ assassinateÂ Pope John Paul II in St Peterâ€™s Square on May 13, 1981.
AÄŸca only succeeded in severely wounding John Paul, wounds he suffered from for decadesÂ until his death in 2005 yet the Pope subsequently forgave and developed a friendship with AÄŸca and successfully advocated for his pardon in 2000.Â (http://tinyurl.com/a483b52)
(The Vatican denied the claim byÂ AÄŸca that heÂ had discussedÂ the Iranian link at with John Paul but I very much doubt there was much of an audience inÂ AÄŸca’s prison cell.)
As yet, no one outside the Muslim world has advocated for the posthumousÂ forgiveness of Ayatollah Khomeini for ordering a hit on theÂ Supreme Pontiff of the Roman Catholic Church.Â Just as AÄŸca was following Khomeini’s instructions I assume Khomeini was following a mandate from Muhammad to commit murder.
Â BABY BURKAS. The level of support for Saudi cleric Sheikh Abdullah Daoud’sÂ ruling thatÂ covering baby girls under burkasÂ will protectÂ them from sexual molestation, a claim based on unidentified sources, is somewhat less than universal.
Muslim Twitterers believed Daoud “denigrates Islam and breaches individual privacy.”Â Sheikh Mohammad Al-Jzlana told Al Arabiya that Dauod’s viewpoint “was denigrating to Islam and Shariah and made Islam look bad.”Â (http://tinyurl.com/a7ppg4k)
I beg to differ.Â Islam and Shariah didn’t need Sheikh Daoud to make them “look bad.”Â Based on their history and the Koran, they look awful on their own merits.Â
If, in fact, Saudi perverts are sexually molesting little girls, perhaps the Saudis should look into the mindset of Saudi men who are so sick that they go afterÂ infants.Â
Could they be influenced by theÂ pedophilia of their Holy Prophet who married an 8 year old or byÂ Koran and Hadith teachings that men are valued twice as highly as women or that men may have multiple wives or that a man is permitted to take women as sex slavesÂ or that women comprise the majority of Hell’sÂ residents or that women are compared to slaves and camelsÂ because they are evil?
Islamists need more than burkas to shield baby girls.Â Muslims are also in dire need of looking into their immortal souls and the precepts of the “Holy” Koran which regards women as virtual chattel which makes their female children fair game for sexual assaults.Â It wouldn’t be a bad idea to investigate the sexual proclivities of Sheikh Abdullah Daoud, who thinks baby girls are too tempting, either.
Â ISLAMIC NERVE.Â If an ayatollah ordering a hit on a pope isn’t reprehensible enough to convince Americans that Islam is a sad, bloody excuse for a religion, if a high-rankingÂ cleric who wants to cover young baby girls under veils to save them from Muslim predation isn’t enough to convince us that Muslims are a disturbed people, how shouldÂ weÂ interpret a planned million Muslim march to commemorate the 12th anniversary of the horrific 9/11 assault on America by Muslims?Â
The words “disgusting,” “sick,” andÂ ”outrageously ballsy” come to mind.Â
In a press release,Â the American Political Action Committee announced it’s “planning an historic event for 9.11.13″ in whichÂ a million Muslims will marchÂ in Washington D.C. to demand protection of Muslims’Â ”civil rights” and new laws ensuring their First Amendment Amendment privileges,Â to ask President Obama to fulfill “his promise of a transparent government,” andÂ to request “the release of the 9/11 commission report to the American people.”Â
AMPAC’s rationale?Â “On 9.11.01 our country was forever changed by the horrific events in New York.Â The entire country was victimized by the acts done on that day.Â Muslim and Non Muslim alike were traumatized but we as Muslims continue 12 years later to be victimized by being made the villains.” (http://tinyurl.com/acrp8n2)Â
MEMO TO CLUELESS AMPAC:
1. Why should Obama be transparent withÂ you when his governmentÂ hasn’t been honest with the rest of us?Â
2. The official Final Report of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, such as it is, was released on July 22, 2004.Â Â
3. Muslims were unmistakably the “villains” on September 11, 2001 andÂ they have a helluva nerve bitching about victimization!
Â Â Â Â Â Â Â